Politics & Government

Lake Forest Repeals Ban on Sex Offenders in Parks

Amid heated debate, officials say the law would cost too much to defend in court, and tentatively vote to strike it down.

Citing the high cost of defending the measure in court, the Lake Forest City Council voted Tuesday to end its ban on sex offenders in city parks.

Keeping the law would cost at least $200,000 in legal fees to defend, said City Attorney Scott C. Smith. And that's only if the city won, a prospect that seems increasingly questionable. Losing in court could bring penalties, including paying the legal costs of the sex offenders who challenge the ban.

As one of more than a dozen OC cities to enact the sex offender bans spearheaded by District Attorney Tony Rackauckas, Lake Forest's move is being watched by city leaders throughout Orange County.

Find out what's happening in Lake Forestwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The city knew it had a legal battle on its hands when the law passed unanimously last December, said Susan Kang Schroeder, chief of staff for the Orange County district attorney's office.

"When we were here last year, we told them we would be sued," she said.

Find out what's happening in Lake Forestwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Mayor Kathryn McCullough asked the D.A. to promise to pay the city's legal costs if opponents sued. 

The question set off an argument between her and Rackauckas. Read a transcript of that argument here.

Rackauckas said neither he nor the county could be expected to pay the city's fees.

One activist lawyer said she had two clients ready to sue the city if the repeal did not go forward.

"If that ordinance is not repealed, that lawsuit will be filed," said Janice Bellucci, state organizer with California Reform Sex Offender Laws.

Bellucci said only 1.9 percent of California's sex offenders are arrested again for sex crimes. "They are people who have already been in prison, already paid their debt to society," she said.

But Lake Forest resident Mary Axelrod said the ban was needed to protect the city's children from molestation.

"This is a sickness, and the only way to stop this is for them to stay away and avoid the temptation, which is going into a group of children," she said. "I would think the safety of the children would outweigh lawsuits because the people come first in all occasions."

Robert Curtis, a Lake Forest hairdresser convicted 12 years ago of a misdemeanor sex crime, said the ban keeps him from watching over his son in city parks.

Rackauckas said he was unsure if the city's repeal would be repeated around the county, saying "it's pretty hard to call." Currently about half of Orange County's cities have enacted similar laws.

A county law along the same lines is no longer being enforced following the overturned conviction of Hugo Godinez.

Keeping the law on the books but not enforcing it would still leave Lake Forest with "some vulnerability" to lawsuits, Smith said.

The council tentatively reversed the measure on a 4-0 vote with one abstention. The reversal will return later for final approval.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK IN THE COMMENTS

Should the city defend the ban despite the risk of court challenges?


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here