Court Strikes Down Law Barring Sex Offenders from Parks

The Court of Appeal says the local laws conflict with state law.

Fifteen Orange County cities have laws on the books, including Lake Forest, to stop sex offenders from entering parks. Patch file photo.
Fifteen Orange County cities have laws on the books, including Lake Forest, to stop sex offenders from entering parks. Patch file photo.

A panel of appellate court justices today struck down all Orange County laws banning registered sex offenders from parks, ruling they conflicted with state law.

The published opinion by a Fourth District Court of Appeal panel dealt with Irvine's law banning people convicted of crimes against children from parks, according to an attorney representing Hugo Godinez, whose conviction in a similar case was overturned.

“I'm pleased the Court of Appeal agreed that the regulation of sex offenders has to be done on a statewide level, so that it is uniform,” said Scott Van Camp of the Orange County Public Defender's Office, who represented Godinez and the defendant challenging the Irvine ordinance.

A county ordinance making it a misdemeanor for a registered sex offender to enter a county park without the county sheriff's written permission was also overturned in an unpublished opinion.

State laws ban parolees of some serious sex offenses involving victims younger than 14 from entering parks, Van Camp said.

Ordinances banning registered sex offenders from parks are on the books in 15 Orange County cities. Most of them ban registered sex offenders, except for Irvine and Fountain Valley, which only targets those convicted of crimes against children.

The rulings can be appealed to the state Supreme Court, or county officials can ask the appellate justices to review their opinions, Van Camp said.

“We're going to review our options requesting the Supreme Court of California to review this case,'' said Susan Kang Schroeder, the chief of staff for Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas.

“We believe in this war in protecting children against sex offenders that the state never intended to pre-empt every law keeping sex offenders out of parks.”

Orange County Board of Supervisors Chairman Shawn Nelson, who led the adoption of bans in Fullerton and in the county, told City News Service he does not like the rulings, but accepts them.

“It's disappointing, but, hey, they're a branch of government, too, and they have a responsibility and they've ruled and that's it,” Nelson said.

“The state Supreme Court might want to hear it, but I don't want to spend any more money on it,” Nelson said. “We did our best to protect our kids in the community, but I respect the Court of Appeal... I think we have to accept it and move on.”

Godinez, who registered as a sex offender with Costa Mesa police, went to Mile Square Regional Park in Fountain Valley on May 5, 2011, during a Cinco de Mayo celebration.

He was found guilty, but a panel of Orange County Superior Court judges, who handle appeals in misdemeanor cases, overturned his conviction in April and sent the case to the Fourth District Court of Appeal for further review.

-- City News Service

Bob Forsberg January 11, 2014 at 03:08 AM
...and the Sacramento tax collectors wonder why parents with children are moving out of California in droves.
Shelly Stow January 11, 2014 at 09:30 AM
Several states have laws in place that prohibit individual jurisdictions from enacting laws or ordinances that go further in restrictions or punishments than the state law does. With what has been done in this ruling, California is moving closer to conforming to what is a necessity for all laws but has been vastly ignored with sexual offense laws, and that is the requirement that laws address an actual need and that the laws are fact and research based. The state law prohibiting certain offenders from child-areas, while still not really backed by empirical evidence, is more realistic than a law prohibiting all former offenders from those areas.
Mike Mcd January 11, 2014 at 11:26 PM
In Sodom by the Sea (formerly the City of Saint Francis) the LARRY BRINKIN Racist Pederast Posse pretty much runs the place, along with their Co-Misandrist Dyke Coven... Brinkin is revered in the Pederast / Homosex movement in Frisco (like 'beat poet' Allen Ginsberg & Harry Hay) and he was earning $135,000 per year at the Human Rights Commission there until his retirement in 2010. The San Francisco board of supervisors established a “Larry Brinkin Week” in February 2010 in his honour. Brinkin is "married" to another man and is a respected member of the community... SEE: Leading California gay rights leader arrested over child porn possession http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/leading-california-gay-rights-leader-arrested-over-child-porn-possession/ http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2012/07/09/ted_haggard_larry_brinkin_and_glaring_media_bias/page/full http://cal-catholic.com/wordpress/2012/06/27/no-shame/ And their plans to Honor 'nambla founder' and 'beat poet' Allen Ginsberg are just another logical extension is the Homosex Pederast Kult - that has caused so much harm to the Church and its Boys... SEE ALSO - Life on GLAAD's Blacklist By Robert Oscar Lopez http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/12/life_on_glaads_blacklist.html#ixzz2onhy3m8T Readers will have to forgive me for sounding angry, but the recent news involving GLAAD has enraged me. Mark Steyn's most recent piece in National Review sums up some of the worst aspects of the epic saga known as GLAAD v. Duck Dynasty. Steyn resonates with me on one key point: yes, GLAAD is ridiculous and foolish. We knew this. But some conservatives who should know better are truly pathetic. A National Review editor scolds Steyn for being "puerile," while people on Fox News say that Phil Robertson should have been suspended. Pusillanimous obeisance to false ideology isn't exclusive to left or right. A bunch of people on the left (see here and here) called GLAAD out, and I'm glad they did. Yet a bunch of people on the right are still terrified of GLAAD, or else actually believe that it's defamation to say negative things or think negative thoughts about homosexuality. In case you don't know the full extent of GLAAD's fascism, let me tell you what GLAAD did
Julie Drake January 12, 2014 at 10:28 AM
The Lake Forest City Council had the good sense to abandon this unconstitutional ship over a year ago. They did so AFTER the initial lower court ruling in this case, a law suit that was leveled against the City and the OCDA's unwillingness to guarantee covering the City litigation costs to fight his ill-conceived crusade. Aside from the fact that the LF City Council passed this law initially a year prior, they should be commended for their sanity. It should be noted and not forgotten that both Councilmembers Nick and Robinson voted against the repeal of this unconstitutional law in December 2012.
Julie Drake January 12, 2014 at 10:32 AM
@Bob Forsberg - If you are suggesting that parents with children are leaving the State of California because its courts and judges uphold the California State Constitution - a Constitution under which their children will live soon enough as adults - I do not see the problem. I suggest you research alternate causes for an exodus of tax payers from California.
Jesse Adams January 13, 2014 at 02:02 PM
A link to the decision would be a nice touch ….
Ricardo Carlos Castro January 13, 2014 at 11:57 PM
I used to go home late at night. While I was scanning a few blogs, I found out this application that can help me be safe always and if theres an emergency I can easily get connected with my safety network or route the call directly to 911. Its a really great application because we dont know when will crimes attacks. Check this link:http://www.SafeKidZone.com


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something